Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLa Delfa, Nicholas J.
dc.contributor.authorAbdel-Malek, Daniel M.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-16T15:54:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-29T16:53:55Z
dc.date.available2019-10-16T15:54:10Z
dc.date.available2022-03-29T16:53:55Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10155/1067
dc.description.abstractLocalized muscle fatigue (LMF) has been associated with numerous negative outcomes, including a reduction in task performance and development of musculoskeletal injury. Thus, the quantification of LMF development in response to occupational task demands has become a major focus in the ergonomics literature. In this thesis, Study 1 showed how a familiarization session, including targeted feedback on ratings of perceived fatigue (RPF), resulted in a significant improvement in error between RPF and measures of force output and electromyography. Study 2 compared the LMF response at three different “acceptable” limits along the ACGIH® threshold limit curve, which describes acceptable relative force intensity for a given level of repetitive work (i.e. duty cycle). Exposures at higher duty cycles (and lower force intensity) were found to elicit the largest LMF responses. This thesis concludes with practical recommendations to help ergonomists better assess and prevent the accumulation of excessive LMF in the workplace.en
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technologyen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectMuscle fatigueen
dc.subjectPsychophysicsen
dc.subjectErgonomicsen
dc.subjectUpper extremity injuryen
dc.subjectRepetitive worken
dc.titleExploring subjective and objective localized muscle fatigue responses at recommended upper limb ergonomics limitsen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.degree.levelMaster of Health Sciences (MHSc)en
dc.degree.disciplineKinesiologyen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record