Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAlvi, Shahid
dc.contributor.authorTzotzes, Kamille
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-03T19:46:07Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-29T17:43:01Z
dc.date.available2012-10-03T19:46:07Z
dc.date.available2022-03-29T17:43:01Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10155/268
dc.description.abstractWomen’s sexual victimization is perceived as a one sided problem that emphasizes women’s choices and neglect men’s accountability. Rape myths support an explanation of rape that allows women to remain fearful of sexual victimization. This thesis questions whether contemporary websites regarding women’s safety reinforce rape myths. Components of rape myths include the idea that women’s safety is her responsibility alone, echo traditional gender role expectations, perpetuate dependence on others and security products, and suggest that women’s fear of victimization is normal. A content analysis of thirteen websites regarding women’s safety is the subject of this study. Findings suggest that websites regarding women’s safety are perpetuating components of rape myths through safety suggestions. Keyen
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technologyen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectRape mythen
dc.subjectGender rolesen
dc.subjectWomen's safetyen
dc.titleA content analysis of women's safety websites: rape myths and the interneten
dc.typeThesisen
dc.degree.levelMaster of Arts (MA)en
dc.degree.disciplineCriminologyen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record