• Login
    View Item 
    •   eScholar Home
    • Faculty of Health Sciences
    • Master Theses & Projects
    • View Item
    •   eScholar Home
    • Faculty of Health Sciences
    • Master Theses & Projects
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Patient and physician views of self-testing: blood glucose monitoring

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Iqbal_Sana.pdf (5.052Mb)
    Date
    2017-01-01
    Author
    Iqbal, Sana
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Medical laboratories deliver an invaluable healthcare service by providing laboratory results to aid in the diagnosis and monitoring of disease states. Point-of-care testing (POCT), a sub-sector of medical laboratory services, is completed at the patient’s bedside with the goal of providing clinical laboratory results in a very short time frame to assist caregivers in clinical decision making (Ehrmeyer & Laessig, 2007). The technology within this sector of laboratory sciences continues to grow rapidly, making Point-of-Care (POC) tests more accessible for use in a variety of settings, essentially decentralizing laboratory testing. This represents an important shift in healthcare culture as it provides healthcare practitioners and patients alike, the opportunity to perform an ever-growing number of laboratory tests, anywhere and at any time. Through the use of semi-structured interview questions, this qualitative research project utilized a case study informed methodology to understand the role of patient autonomy in self-testing (ST) and the function of accountability as it relates to POCT, when testing occurs in an unregulated environment. Findings suggest that ST and self-care behaviours in diabetes that are autonomously initiated result in positive outcomes, as patients are more likely to be active participants in their own healthcare. The principle of patient autonomy was highlighted in the research by the need to build strong patient/physician relationships in order to facilitate dialogue that promotes informed decision-making, an important aspect of patient care. Patients also felt that participating in ST provided them with a greater sense of control over their health, and that an increased frequency of ST could be seen only in a positive manner, regardless of which self-test was being performed. Conversely, the cost and the possibility of encountering difficulties in the interpretation and troubleshooting of self-test results were seen as negative aspects of ST. Through this research endeavour, the necessity for greater measures of accountability were also made evident, as patients and physicians discussed how self-testing could impact patient care. Short-term and long-term goals are provided as recommendations to strengthen accountability in POCT within unregulated environments.
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/10155/895
    Collections
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations [1336]
    • Master Theses & Projects [190]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of eScholarCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV